Enters confessional. "Forgive me, Father, for I have sinned. It has been 2 months since my last blog post." The fact is, I have been unable to blog because what I have been going through has been so painful and hard. I'm writing this blog post to get back on the horse.
Well-written and interesting. If you have no adversity, God is not paying attention to you, and moreover, you must take each trial as a test of your character. We should chat again soon. Best
Hmm. I tried to edit and save my prior comment, but Substack is disregarding the edit.
To clarify: I wasn't referring to the biometric "censorship" you experienced with FB. Wow! How did they obtain those biometrics, and how were they transmitted to FB each time you attempted to create an account? Rhetorical questions, of course. :)
Page 3: "Facebook knowingly captured biometric information for its own commercial benefit, to train and improve its facial-recognition technology, and thereby create a powerful artificial intelligence ("AI**) apparatus that reaches all corners of the world and ensnares even those who have intentionally avoided using Facebook services."
So they were using our photos we submitted to train their AI-driven facial recognition technology. Which they then used to censor us.
Interestingly, I remember when I tried to open a new account after the first time I got banned. It let me back on, but then after I uploaded a photo of myself, it banned me.
Thanks for that info. I was imagining something even more sinister and coordinated - like Apple or Google sharing facial recognition biometrics behind the scenes.
So if you used a burner phone and email, without uploading photos, would you be able to join?
Interesting. So (speculating) the burner was tied to you via financial transaction; the phone had stealth facial recognition that fed into Meta; your IP addresses were being monitored; or some other explanation. Bastards.
I paid for the phone with cash. New SIM card. And using a VPN. The only thing I didn’t do was cover the camera on my phone so they could have used that to see it was me.
I was wondering why you were so quiet lately. Prayers to you Ann-Marie, you are a warrior.
Actually I'm pretty sure it's not unconstitutional or illegal for a private entity to lawfully censor speech. However, when gov agencies are actively guiding that censorship (see "Twitter files") that's a whole different story.
Edit: I wasn't referring to the biometric "censorship" you experienced with FB. Wow.
Yes, it is 100% unconstitutional for a corporate entity to censor the speech of an American citizen.
I talked to Margy Flynn about this -- I asked her this specific question -- when we were at the Red Pill Expo in South Dakota in June. She said, "If their corporation exists in the United States, they must follow our Constitution."
I know, what you are saying is what people say but they are wrong. Just like people say we have to pay taxes. Wrong.
In my opinion the issue is with corporations themselves and the legal (but not constitutional) basis for their existence. Back in the era when the U.S. Constitution was drafted, state legislatures granted corporate charters - and revoked them when they went "bad". Can you imagine a state legislature doing that today to Twitter, Facebook, or Google?
PS: I always need to remind myself that "I am not a constitutional scholar" is a mind control mantra. Nobody should need to be a "scholar" of the Constitution. It should be vigorously taught and discussed in schools and among adults.
I just read a lot of print but not surprised at what you have discovered as I have discovered the same things but in a different place and time. I want to tell you something personal gal, you are made of good stuff and to boot you already know that all is never as it meets the eye. And you are different and not the regular woman typeset. I truly possess a great deal of admiration and respect and controlled but strong affection for you.
My existence has been a battle but compared to yours it is cotton candy. You occupy a different existence than most of us but on a higher plane. I am sure you have searched "React19" and am sure that you are tough. Special gal? Nope. Too insufficient in strength to be just a special gal.
Believe me I have women in my life as friends who have been hurt terribly and I know God's highest creation was woman and she was and is generally more intelligent and imbued with the nobler character traits.
Words do not suffice to recognize you and I fail to bring to the fore actual phrases and descriptions of you as they would not be sufficient unto themselves to seal up the sum.
I am in a protracted battle with the same corrupt CYSTem and this involves two JP's, five OPP pigs, two bureauCRAPS and the supporting CYSTem as a whole. I have fought and won battles against bureauCRAP trash, regulatory agencies, etc. But I have not in my life seen one who is who and what you are.
Remember precious one, the strongest steel comes from the hottest fire and the damned CYSTem is too stupid in its myriads of mundanisty to realize that nor the hate it has created in me that is a strong motivational factor.
I never give up. And never will. The CYSTem has weaknesses that can be exploited and the CYSTem forgets that they are as individuals en masse, alone and unprotected as five OPP pigs will shortly discover. There is NOT defense nor offensive weapon that is stronger than the Truth and it has won every battle I fought for It and will win this one too even if I lose. It is true.
My thoughts and hugs and admiration for “standing up” once more 😊🙏
Thank you. Gonna try to keep standing now.
Well-written and interesting. If you have no adversity, God is not paying attention to you, and moreover, you must take each trial as a test of your character. We should chat again soon. Best
Thanks Robert. I consider you a friend. God bless you and yes let's talk soon. I'm relaunching tomorrow on the triple Lion's Gate 8/8/2024 (8/8/8)
Still getting my period at 56. Will post about that soon and I am interested to hear your thoughts. I will link to your book from my blog post.
Hmm. I tried to edit and save my prior comment, but Substack is disregarding the edit.
To clarify: I wasn't referring to the biometric "censorship" you experienced with FB. Wow! How did they obtain those biometrics, and how were they transmitted to FB each time you attempted to create an account? Rhetorical questions, of course. :)
I didn't know all the details about Ken Paxton's lawsuit...
I just pulled up the complaint and I'm looking at it: https://texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/child-support/State%20of%20Texas%20v.%20Meta%20Platforms%20Inc..pdf
Page 3: "Facebook knowingly captured biometric information for its own commercial benefit, to train and improve its facial-recognition technology, and thereby create a powerful artificial intelligence ("AI**) apparatus that reaches all corners of the world and ensnares even those who have intentionally avoided using Facebook services."
So they were using our photos we submitted to train their AI-driven facial recognition technology. Which they then used to censor us.
Interestingly, I remember when I tried to open a new account after the first time I got banned. It let me back on, but then after I uploaded a photo of myself, it banned me.
Thanks for that info. I was imagining something even more sinister and coordinated - like Apple or Google sharing facial recognition biometrics behind the scenes.
So if you used a burner phone and email, without uploading photos, would you be able to join?
No, I tried using a burner phone with a new email. I was locked out. This was a few months ago.
Interesting. So (speculating) the burner was tied to you via financial transaction; the phone had stealth facial recognition that fed into Meta; your IP addresses were being monitored; or some other explanation. Bastards.
I paid for the phone with cash. New SIM card. And using a VPN. The only thing I didn’t do was cover the camera on my phone so they could have used that to see it was me.
I was wondering why you were so quiet lately. Prayers to you Ann-Marie, you are a warrior.
Actually I'm pretty sure it's not unconstitutional or illegal for a private entity to lawfully censor speech. However, when gov agencies are actively guiding that censorship (see "Twitter files") that's a whole different story.
Edit: I wasn't referring to the biometric "censorship" you experienced with FB. Wow.
Yes, it is 100% unconstitutional for a corporate entity to censor the speech of an American citizen.
I talked to Margy Flynn about this -- I asked her this specific question -- when we were at the Red Pill Expo in South Dakota in June. She said, "If their corporation exists in the United States, they must follow our Constitution."
I know, what you are saying is what people say but they are wrong. Just like people say we have to pay taxes. Wrong.
In my opinion the issue is with corporations themselves and the legal (but not constitutional) basis for their existence. Back in the era when the U.S. Constitution was drafted, state legislatures granted corporate charters - and revoked them when they went "bad". Can you imagine a state legislature doing that today to Twitter, Facebook, or Google?
PS: I always need to remind myself that "I am not a constitutional scholar" is a mind control mantra. Nobody should need to be a "scholar" of the Constitution. It should be vigorously taught and discussed in schools and among adults.
I just read a lot of print but not surprised at what you have discovered as I have discovered the same things but in a different place and time. I want to tell you something personal gal, you are made of good stuff and to boot you already know that all is never as it meets the eye. And you are different and not the regular woman typeset. I truly possess a great deal of admiration and respect and controlled but strong affection for you.
My existence has been a battle but compared to yours it is cotton candy. You occupy a different existence than most of us but on a higher plane. I am sure you have searched "React19" and am sure that you are tough. Special gal? Nope. Too insufficient in strength to be just a special gal.
Believe me I have women in my life as friends who have been hurt terribly and I know God's highest creation was woman and she was and is generally more intelligent and imbued with the nobler character traits.
Words do not suffice to recognize you and I fail to bring to the fore actual phrases and descriptions of you as they would not be sufficient unto themselves to seal up the sum.
I am in a protracted battle with the same corrupt CYSTem and this involves two JP's, five OPP pigs, two bureauCRAPS and the supporting CYSTem as a whole. I have fought and won battles against bureauCRAP trash, regulatory agencies, etc. But I have not in my life seen one who is who and what you are.
Remember precious one, the strongest steel comes from the hottest fire and the damned CYSTem is too stupid in its myriads of mundanisty to realize that nor the hate it has created in me that is a strong motivational factor.
I never give up. And never will. The CYSTem has weaknesses that can be exploited and the CYSTem forgets that they are as individuals en masse, alone and unprotected as five OPP pigs will shortly discover. There is NOT defense nor offensive weapon that is stronger than the Truth and it has won every battle I fought for It and will win this one too even if I lose. It is true.
You are precious. Do not forget it.
Always Edward